You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a WinForms developer, I want modern configuration, options, user settings, logging, exception handling, and background/health services through one extensible model so that desktop applications use familiar .NET infrastructure without losing desktop-specific behavior.
Rationale and user benefit
The builder should make common infrastructure consistent with other .NET workloads while respecting per-user settings, UI-thread dispatch, application lifetime, offline desktop operation, privacy, and deployment constraints.
Scope boundary
Own configuration/options integration, the modern settings abstraction and migration path, logging providers/extensions, exception services, hosted/background services, and appropriate health diagnostics. Consume host/lifetime and DI contracts; do not own their implementation or templates.
Acceptance criteria
Configuration sources and precedence are documented and predictable.
Strongly typed options and validation work before UI startup.
Per-user settings can load, save, upgrade, and report failures without silently losing data.
Logging and exception handling preserve UI-thread context and do not expose sensitive data by default.
Background and health services stop cleanly with the application.
Third parties can extend the builder without internal dependencies.
Definition of Done
Service boundaries and defaults are API-reviewed.
Implementations, tests, samples, migration guidance, and diagnostics are complete.
File contention, corruption, cancellation, privacy, deployment, performance, and resource stability are validated.
Parallelization
This is foundation stream C. Work behind extension methods and service contracts so streams A and B do not need to edit these providers.
User story
As a WinForms developer, I want modern configuration, options, user settings, logging, exception handling, and background/health services through one extensible model so that desktop applications use familiar .NET infrastructure without losing desktop-specific behavior.
Rationale and user benefit
The builder should make common infrastructure consistent with other .NET workloads while respecting per-user settings, UI-thread dispatch, application lifetime, offline desktop operation, privacy, and deployment constraints.
Scope boundary
Own configuration/options integration, the modern settings abstraction and migration path, logging providers/extensions, exception services, hosted/background services, and appropriate health diagnostics. Consume host/lifetime and DI contracts; do not own their implementation or templates.
Acceptance criteria
Definition of Done
Parallelization
This is foundation stream C. Work behind extension methods and service contracts so streams A and B do not need to edit these providers.