Question
What catalog and client-version facts constrain a safe Ultra implementation for Sol and Terra in this repository?
Investigate and record:
- which live and GitHub fallback fields must be parsed and retained, including
multi_agent_version, supported-effort descriptions, minimal_client_version, visibility, and API support;
- whether the current account-scoped catalog endpoint differs from the checked-in upstream snapshot for Ultra-relevant fields;
- how client-version headers influence model/effort visibility and whether the current asynchronous refresh creates a cold-start race;
- the implications of current
0.116.0 fallback constants versus Sol/Terra's advertised minimum;
- stale-cache and account-scope transitions;
- custom-model aliases and effort-suffix matching;
- which compatibility behavior is representable from authoritative metadata, in line with the repository's no-hypothetical-fallback invariant.
The resolution should state verified constraints and candidate compatibility fixes, but leave product visibility and architecture choices to their decision tickets.
Question
What catalog and client-version facts constrain a safe Ultra implementation for Sol and Terra in this repository?
Investigate and record:
multi_agent_version, supported-effort descriptions,minimal_client_version, visibility, and API support;0.116.0fallback constants versus Sol/Terra's advertised minimum;The resolution should state verified constraints and candidate compatibility fixes, but leave product visibility and architecture choices to their decision tickets.