You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ToolHive's registry documentation says legacy conversion is lossless, uses the upstream MCP format, and supports publisher-provided extensions plus arbitrary custom_metadata. That looks like a clean interop seam for selection facts without changing ToolHive's own io.github.stacklok extension.
I maintain ASM, which can publish a sparse asm block under MCP Registry's publisher-provided _meta: provenance, access/quota boundaries, approval/risk, and optional links to mutable facts. ToolHive would remain authoritative for installation, isolation, policy, and runtime execution.
Would you be open to a minimal round-trip fixture/test showing that a sibling publisher-provided ASM block survives registry parsing/conversion and remains available to a downstream consumer? No ranking behavior or new required schema fields would be proposed. If the test belongs in toolhive-core rather than this repository, please point me to the preferred location.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ToolHive's registry documentation says legacy conversion is lossless, uses the upstream MCP format, and supports publisher-provided extensions plus arbitrary
custom_metadata. That looks like a clean interop seam for selection facts without changing ToolHive's ownio.github.stacklokextension.I maintain ASM, which can publish a sparse
asmblock under MCP Registry's publisher-provided_meta: provenance, access/quota boundaries, approval/risk, and optional links to mutable facts. ToolHive would remain authoritative for installation, isolation, policy, and runtime execution.Would you be open to a minimal round-trip fixture/test showing that a sibling publisher-provided ASM block survives registry parsing/conversion and remains available to a downstream consumer? No ranking behavior or new required schema fields would be proposed. If the test belongs in
toolhive-corerather than this repository, please point me to the preferred location.Reference shape: https://github.com/YE-YI7/asm-spec/blob/main/examples/mcp-server-json/operational-envelope-with-asm.server.json
All reactions