Skip to content

ci: rename branch-protection caller job id to branch-protection - #115

Open
rubenvdlinde wants to merge 1 commit into
betafrom
hotfix/ci-branch-protection-job-id-beta
Open

ci: rename branch-protection caller job id to branch-protection#115
rubenvdlinde wants to merge 1 commit into
betafrom
hotfix/ci-branch-protection-job-id-beta

Conversation

@rubenvdlinde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

GitHub names a reusable-workflow status context <caller-job-id> / <called-job-name>.

This branch's caller job id was not branch-protection, so the shared branch-protection
workflow reported under the wrong context name, and the org ruleset requirement
branch-protection / check-branch never reported at all — not as a failure, as nothing.

Several of these beta branches carry a second, independent fault: the reusable workflow was
referenced as Conduction/.github instead of ConductionNL/.github. The Conduction org does not
exist (GET /repos/Conduction/.github -> 404), so on those branches the workflow could not even
resolve. Where present, that is fixed here too — renaming the job id alone would not have made the
context appear.

This matters for beta -> main promotion PRs, whose head is beta, so beta's tip is what
decides the context name and the workflow reference.

Does not change what is required and does not touch any ruleset or branch protection.

…ion`

GitHub names a reusable-workflow status context `<caller-job-id> / <called-job-name>`, so this
caller reported as `check / check-branch` while the org ruleset requires
`branch-protection / check-branch`.

Also repoints the reusable workflow from `Conduction/.github` to `ConductionNL/.github`. The
`Conduction` org does not exist (404), so on this branch the workflow could not resolve at all —
a second, independent reason the required context never reported.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant