Skip to content

Clarify Exposure SQL Model use cases - #39092

Open
pavlokhrebto wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dd/pavlo.khrebto/exposure-sql-flag-exposures
Open

Clarify Exposure SQL Model use cases#39092
pavlokhrebto wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dd/pavlo.khrebto/exposure-sql-flag-exposures

Conversation

@pavlokhrebto

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Motivation: Source product changes support using Exposure SQL Models to supply exposure records for Datadog Feature Flag experiments when decision metrics use warehouse data.

Source PRs:
https://github.com/ddoghq/dd-source/pull/49220
https://github.com/DataDog/web-ui/pull/340582

Changes:

  • Updated hugo/content/en/experiments/concepts/exposure_sql.md to explain that Exposure SQL Models support bring-your-own randomization and Datadog Feature Flag experiments with warehouse decision metrics.
  • Documented that the model must map the experiment subject type and every subject type required by the analysis so exposures can be joined to metric data.

Testing

  • Ran git diff --check.
  • Attempted vale hugo/content/en/experiments/concepts/exposure_sql.md, but vale is not installed in this sandbox.

Merge readiness

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

  • ⚠️ Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). If you've already created your PR with an incorrect branch name, please rename your branch and open a fresh PR.
  • 🤖 New: Comment with /review to run an automated check that catches common issues before a Documentation team member reviews your PR.

AI assistance

Used Bits Code to draft and apply the documentation edit; manually reviewed the diff.

Additional notes

None.


PR by Bits - View session in Datadog

Comment @DataDog to request changes

@datadog-official

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

View session in Datadog

Bits Code status: ✅ Done

CI Auto-fix: Disabled | Enable

Comment @DataDog to request changes

@pavlokhrebto
pavlokhrebto requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2026 13:24
@datadog-official

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I can only run on private repositories.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@jhgilbert jhgilbert added the astro-reorg-no-conflicts Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg label Aug 11, 2026

@evazorro evazorro left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating the docs!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

astro-reorg-no-conflicts Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg Bits AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants