Skip to content

Fix issue #174#175

Merged
lohedges merged 1 commit into
develfrom
fix_174
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Fix issue #174#175
lohedges merged 1 commit into
develfrom
fix_174

Conversation

@lohedges

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR closes #174 by using persistent ThreadPoolExector objects within the main replica exchange production block. This isn't really a bug, since the existing code worked fine, just a minor performance consideration, i.e. no functionally new feature.

@lohedges lohedges added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 21, 2026
@lohedges
lohedges merged commit 74f1590 into devel Jul 21, 2026
4 checks passed
@lohedges
lohedges deleted the fix_174 branch July 21, 2026 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make production repex thread pools for persistent

1 participant