Minor fixes for Intel Xe cards + Memory frequency - #495
Draft
Steve-Tech wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Steve-Tech
marked this pull request as draft
July 27, 2026 14:20
For i915, this only seems to appear in the backport drivers: - https://github.com/intel-gpu/intel-gpu-i915-backports/blob/88e15eff7c9ce9eb3941333088d38cf571960cfd/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c#L903-L935 For Xe, this only seems to be available for Ponte Vecchio data center GPUs: - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240109110418.2065101-1-sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com/
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, this PR makes the following changes:
xekernel driver: nvtop reportscur_freq(requested frequency) instead ofact_freq(actual frequency) #450CAP_PERFMON.cur_freqvsact_freqis still present withoutCAP_PERFMON, howeveract_freqfrequently returns0, so I've leftcur_freqfor now.I have a question:
mem_clock_speedso that it gets displayed, or would you prefer I usemem_clock_speed_max?Thanks,
Steve