Skip to content

docs(fork): 0018 no longer claims T3 Code has no header or protocol names #49

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
yordis merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

docs(fork): 0018 no longer claims T3 Code has no header or protocol names #49

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions docs/fork/0018-the-standard-otel-variables-are-honored.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,9 +32,11 @@

T3 Code has had a real OTLP exporter for a while, and it was unreachable for
almost everyone who wanted it. You had to learn a second set of names for
settings you had already configured once, and headers, resource attributes, and
the wire format had no names at all, so an authenticated collector or a
protobuf-only one simply could not be used.
settings you had already configured once, and the standard names for headers,
resource attributes, and the wire format reached nothing, so an authenticated
collector or a protobuf-only one simply could not be used. T3 Code has its own
header and protocol names now, but the standard ones still arrive through this
divergence.

The cost of that shows up as silence rather than as an error. Someone with a
collector in their shell profile reasonably assumes the app found it, sees a
Expand Down
Loading