Skip to content

showcase: add AI-Hub Solana Evidence demo - #119

Closed
MDDunno128 wants to merge 3 commits into
Virtual-Protocol:mainfrom
MDDunno128:codex/ai-hub-solana-evidence
Closed

MDDunno128 wants to merge 3 commits into
Virtual-Protocol:mainfrom
MDDunno128:codex/ai-hub-solana-evidence

Conversation

@MDDunno128

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Showcase Project

What shipped

The package documents a public-data Solana evidence adapter offered through ACP by CryptoLab Solana Evidence at 0.02 USDC per job. The real September 22 example preserves its timestamp, source URLs and partial-data warning. Provider connectivity and a normal supervised restart were verified. Paid customer delivery and settlement remain unverified. This is an evidence demonstration, not a completed paid-commerce case study.

Project package

  • Added showcase/ai-hub-solana-evidence/showcase.json
  • Added the project README and result-redacted.json
  • Linked public proof and integration guide from the manifest
  • Included exactly three feedback prompts
  • Public card requested after review; hidden is omitted
  • Reusable skill and skills[].sourcePath: not applicable; this one-off public proof submission uses skills: [] as permitted by the contribution guide.
  • No soul.md or private deployment configuration is included.

Skill standard

Not applicable to this evidence-only submission. No deployment skill or provider credentials are published. The README distinguishes read-only discovery from a buyer-authorized paid job and explains evidence limitations.

Safety and redaction

  • No credentials, private wallet material, private account records, personal contact information or device access configuration is published
  • Saved live evidence contains public token/source data only
  • Public/private boundaries and unverified commerce claims are explicit
  • The unavailable holder-concentration field remains null with its warning

Validation

  • Official Showcase manifest validator passed locally: Validated 1 showcase project manifest(s).
  • Example JSON parses; public image and proof URLs return HTTP 200.
  • No paid test, trade, wallet funding or broader signer permissions were used for this submission.

Publish path

Please review for Showcase inclusion. Acceptance and the subsequent docs sync are pending; this PR does not claim the card is already published.

This JSON file contains structured information about the AI-Hub Solana Evidence project, including its title, tagline, description, status, topics, builder information, links, and visual elements.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 22, 2026 22:00
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is a great submission, thanks! The README is especially strong — really appreciate how clearly it states what's proven and what's still a work-in-progress. That kind of honesty is super helpful for anyone trying to learn from these examples.

This looks almost ready to go. I just have one suggestion inline to align the topics with the standard set from the contributor guide, which helps with discovery on the main showcase page.

Also flagged:

  • Should fix: The topics array in showcase.json uses custom values not in the contributor guide's standard list (agents, skills, commerce, security). They should be aligned for consistency and discoverability.
  • Minor: Could not verify the poster image aspect ratio.
  • Minor: Could not verify the live ACP provider listing via acp-cli.

Refreshed after a new push. Any inline suggestions from the first pass may now be stale.

@MDDunno128

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for reviewing. I checked the current Showcase field reference: topic is the single primary category, while topics is explicitly a non-empty list of free-form search/filter tags. The copy conventions repeat that distinction. This manifest uses topic: "agents"; its Solana/evidence/data-quality/mini-PC tags describe the project and pass the official validator. I have retained them for accurate discovery.

The three committed files were independently fetched at the submitted commit and match the reviewed local package. Paid customer delivery and settlement remain explicitly unverified. The remaining workflow approval and final Showcase acceptance are for the maintainers.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟡 Changes recommended

Two moderate issues and one documentation nit remain unresolved.

Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.

Review effort: Lite
Findings: 1 Low severity

Open (1)
What changed in this PR

Adds a Showcase package for AI-Hub’s ACP-based Solana evidence service, including public proof and documented limitations.

Changes:

  • Adds Showcase metadata and proof links.
  • Adds a redacted Solana evidence snapshot.
  • Documents usage, safety boundaries, and validation.
File Summary
showcase/​ai-hub-solana-evidence/​showcase.json Showcase metadata and proof links; requires links to the in-repository README and fixture or removal of duplicates.
showcase/​ai-hub-solana-evidence/​result-redacted.json Public evidence snapshot; requires verification of the market cap/FDV values or an explicit data-quality warning.
showcase/​ai-hub-solana-evidence/​README.md Documents usage and limitations; should describe the generation timestamp rather than source timestamps.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread showcase/ai-hub-solana-evidence/README.md Outdated
The saved JSON contains generated_at and source URLs, but no per-source timestamps.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@MDDunno128 MDDunno128 closed this Sep 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants