[CELEBORN-2428] Fix TierWriter buffer accounting when CompositeByteBuf insertion fails - #3809
Open
Kalvin2077 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[CELEBORN-2428] Fix TierWriter buffer accounting when CompositeByteBuf insertion fails#3809Kalvin2077 wants to merge 1 commit into
Kalvin2077 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
Contributor
|
@Kalvin2077 Overall LGTM. Minor note: in Netty 4.2.10+ |
yew1eb
approved these changes
Aug 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix
TierWriterbuffer accounting and reference-count handling whenCompositeByteBuf.addComponentfails before insertion or during consolidation. Add regression tests and include the shuffle key in write-error logs.Why are the changes needed?
addComponentcan fail before or after taking ownership of the buffer. Treating both cases identically can cause incorrect storage counters or buffer reference-count leaks.Does this PR resolve a correctness bug?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?
TierWriterSuite: 11 tests passed../build/mvn spotless:check -pl worker.