Skip to content

DataFusion weekly project plan (Andrew Lamb) - April 1, 2024聽#9899

Closed

Description

@alamb

Follow on to #9796

It would be great for other contributors to DataFusion who plan non trivial work could try to make them visible somehow as well 馃檹 (feel free to copy / modify the format)

My Highlights from Last Week

My (personal) goals

1000 projects are built using DataFusion 馃搱

My (personal) plans for this week

Project Queue (list of future projects)

Projects I plan to help actively help review / plan

Algorithm for (my) prioritizing PR reviews

Note there are many committers who can and do review and merge PRs, so this is not the priorities of the project as a whole, just the approximate algorithm I use to prioritize my own time

Priority:

  1. Bug fixes (where something is just incorrect), especially regressions (where it used to work and now does not)
  2. Improvements directly related to features needed for InfluxDB (my employer)
  3. Documentation and test improvements (I view these as very strategically important)
  4. PRs that I think are strategically important
  5. Other new features / additions to functionality (note this is the lowest)

The top strategically important projects in my head are:

Thus, if you are interested in contributing to DataFusion and are interested in a fast turn around time I would recommend looking into bug fixes / test improvements / documentation or the projects named above

If you propose adding new functionality, the review cycle will likely be longer. You can make it a shorter cycle by looking at the comments on other recent PRs and following the same model (e.g. ensure there are tests in sqllogictest for example, the CI passes, includes documentation, etc)

Background

The idea of this ticket is make my plans for DataFusion visible, largely for my own personal organizational needs, but also to:

  1. Communicate / coordinate in the community
  2. Help provide an interesting summary of what is happening in DataFusion this week

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Apr 1, 2024
  2. pinned this issue on Apr 1, 2024
  3. matthewmturner commented on Apr 1, 2024

    @matthewmturner
    Contributor

    Really interested to see your thoughts on custom indices, its something were currently working on to improve performance of listing table.

  4. seddonm1 commented on Apr 3, 2024

    @seddonm1
    Contributor

    Sorry for the location and possibly dumb question, but shouldn't all functions be exported here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/functions/src/unicode/mod.rs#L138

    I am probably using the library incorrectly but (for example) LENGTH will not be registered by the central context here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/2f550032140d42d1ee6d8ed86f7790766fa7302e/datafusion/core/src/execution/context/mod.rs#L1450

  5. alamb commented on Apr 3, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    Hi @seddonm1 馃憢

    Sorry for the location and possibly dumb question, but shouldn't all functions be exported here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/functions/src/unicode/mod.rs#L138

    Yes that is the intention

    I am probably using the library incorrectly but (for example) LENGTH will not be registered by the central context here:

    https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/2f550032140d42d1ee6d8ed86f7790766fa7302e/datafusion/core/src/execution/context/mod.rs#L1450

    I think length is registered as an alias of character_length

  6. seddonm1 commented on Apr 3, 2024

    @seddonm1
    Contributor

    Thanks @alamb . If you look at the first link I cannot see anywhere where the length alias is actually registered. My queries which previously worked started failing after this update. I haven't investigated if more functions have also not been registered.

  7. alamb commented on Apr 4, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    DataFusion 37.0.0 is released: #9682 馃尞

  8. seddonm1 commented on Apr 4, 2024

    @seddonm1
    Contributor
  9. alamb commented on Apr 5, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    BTW something cool for next week -- @milenkovicm WASM UDFs #9326 / #9326 (comment) / https://github.com/milenkovicm/wasaffi

  10. alamb commented on Apr 5, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    Really interested to see your thoughts on custom indices, its something were currently working on to improve performance of listing table.

    In case anyone else is following along, here are some items related to indexing:

    While I had this on the brain, @matthewmturner I also filed #9964 as I suspect others will be interested in helping make ListingTable faster too

  11. alamb commented on Apr 5, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    Reviews:
    @jayzhan211 is starting to pull aggregate functions out of the core: #9960

  12. alamb commented on Apr 8, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    Next week #10002

  13. unpinned this issue on Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions