Skip to content

Release fmrireg 0.3.0 - #244

Merged
bbuchsbaum merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
release/0.3.0
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

bbuchsbaum merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
release/0.3.0

Conversation

@bbuchsbaum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Bumps the version to 0.3.0.

  • DESCRIPTION: Version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.0.
  • NEWS.md: the top heading # fmrireg 0.2.0 → # fmrireg 0.3.0. The last tag is v0.1.2 and 0.2.0 was never tagged or released, so everything collected under that heading ships as 0.3.0.
  • README.md status line: 0.3.0.
  • ?coef.fmri_lm "Orientation change" section (roxygen source and Rd): 0.2.0 → 0.3.0, since 0.3.0 is the first release carrying that change.

codemeta.json is left to the GitHub Action that regenerates it.

After merge: tag v0.3.0 on the merge commit.

Downstream fmrireg (>= 0.2.0) floors (e.g. fmrialigned) remain satisfied. Independent of #243, which only touches Remotes; either can merge first.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

0.2.0 was never tagged or released (the last tag is v0.1.2), so the
unreleased changes collected under the 0.2.0 NEWS heading ship as 0.3.0.
Retitle that heading, and move the README status line and the coef()
orientation-change section to 0.3.0, the first release with that change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-27T00:14:25.057920Z bbad3d9 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bbad3d91a1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread DESCRIPTION
Type: Package
Title: Regression Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data
Version: 0.2.0
Version: 0.3.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep the tagged release metadata at version 0.3.0

When this release is tagged on its merge commit as described, DESCRIPTION will report 0.3.0 while the same tagged tree's codemeta.json still reports 0.2.0 (including its package description). The update in .github/workflows/update-codemeta.yaml runs only after the push to main and creates a later commit, so it cannot repair metadata at an already-created release tag; regenerate codemeta.json in the release commit or place the tag on the generated follow-up commit.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved. Cursor Security Agent completed with no findings that need human review; Cursor Bugbot was not running on this PR. No reviewers were assigned.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

@bbuchsbaum
bbuchsbaum merged commit 3e2fd8d into master Sep 27, 2026
9 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant