These are both lightweight formal methods backed by SAT/SMT solvers that seem pretty approachable. Alloy seems more useful for initial planning and prototyping, while LiquidHaskell seems more useful for making sure that your implementation behaves according to the spec/refinements.
I'll need a bit of time to play around with both of these, but will be keen to talk about them once I have.
These are both lightweight formal methods backed by SAT/SMT solvers that seem pretty approachable. Alloy seems more useful for initial planning and prototyping, while LiquidHaskell seems more useful for making sure that your implementation behaves according to the spec/refinements.
I'll need a bit of time to play around with both of these, but will be keen to talk about them once I have.