Skip to content

Security: bitty-terminal/bitty-plugins-docs

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

This document describes how security reports for the bitty-plugins-docs repository are handled. Normative product security requirements live in the canonical bitty-docs security corpus (docs/security/) and take precedence over anything stated here.

Supported Versions

Version Supported
Unreleased No — no version of this project has been released

There are currently no supported releases. Do not rely on this repository for production use; all documented behavior is pre-implementation design material.

Reporting a Vulnerability

Report security vulnerabilities privately by opening a GitHub Security Advisory.

Do not report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues, pull requests, or discussion channels.

When reporting, please include as much of the following as possible:

  • A description of the vulnerability and its potential impact.
  • Steps to reproduce, or a proof of concept.
  • Affected specification sections, contracts, or generated outputs, and (once they exist) plugin, SDK version, and manifest.
  • Any known mitigations or workarounds.

Disclosure Policy

Reports are handled through coordinated disclosure:

  1. The report is acknowledged and triaged privately.
  2. A fix is developed and validated out of public view.
  3. Once releases exist, a release containing the fix is published.
  4. A public advisory is published afterward, crediting the reporter unless anonymity is requested.

Response Expectations

The targets below take effect once this repository accepts them:

  • Acknowledge a new advisory within 5 business days.
  • Provide a status update at least every 14 calendar days while a report is open.
  • Publish the advisory after a fixed version is available, or after 90 days if no fix is feasible, whichever comes first.

Scope Note

This repository is a documentation corpus: it ships no executable product and grants no runtime authority. In-scope findings include a specification that would let a plugin escape the capability model, contradict a P0 trust boundary, or define an install path that executes package code. Security requirements for future implementations live in the canonical bitty-docs security corpus, which takes precedence when statements conflict.

There aren't any published security advisories