Conversation
…superlatives
- 36. Empty population claims: unverifiable counts ("almost no one",
"a problem nobody named") that appeal to evidence the writer never gathered
- 37. Hedge then overstate: soft opener plus strong claim in one sentence
- 38. Unearned superlatives: rankings the text hasn't established
- Extend section 7 word list with passive-narrator (flagged/surfaced/noted)
and filler-adjective (significant/substantive/substantial) families
- Bump version 2.11.2 -> 2.12.0; update README pattern tables and changelog
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three patterns for a common family of verifiability tells, plus two additions to the section 7 word list. All examples follow the house format and stay in neutral, non-domain prose.
36. Empty population claims. Unverifiable counts like "almost no one measures this" or the relative-clause variant "a problem nobody named". These sound empirical but lean on evidence the writer never gathered. This sits next to section 5 (vague sources) but stays distinct: section 5 is about missing attribution, this one is about asserting a distribution the writer cannot defend.
37. Hedge then overstate. A soft opener paired with a strong claim in one sentence ("It's worth noting that X is the single most important..."). The hedge gives room to retreat while the superlative does the asserting, so the reader has to guess how much is meant.
38. Unearned superlatives. "the most important thing", "the single source of truth", where the ranking is not established nearby or attributed. Keep when defended or quoted; otherwise demote or drop.
Section 7 additions. Passive-narrator words (flagged, surfaced, noted) that point without naming the actor, and filler adjectives (significant, substantive, substantial) that claim importance without backing it.
Version bumped to 2.12.0; README pattern tables and changelog updated.
scripts/validate-package.pypasses.