Skip to content

🤖 release: v0.28.5 - #4175

Merged
ibetitsmike merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mike/release-v0.28.5
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

🤖 release: v0.28.5#4175
ibetitsmike merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mike/release-v0.28.5

Conversation

@ibetitsmike

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Version bump for the v0.28.5 patch release. Headline changes since v0.28.4: remote server connections in the desktop app (#4101), self-updating xum server under a restart supervisor (#4083, #4127), first-class GPT-6 Astra and Astra Pro support including Codex OAuth routing (#4064, #4094, #4106, #4124), token-budget context window rollovers (#4097), the workspace remembering model and mode on send (#3968), in-place plugin updates (#4164), the optional flat sidebar chat list (#3994), and copying selected chat text as Markdown (#4170). It also carries a long run of streaming, compaction, and task-lifecycle fixes (reconnect streaming #4123, message edits during active streams #4153, Codex OAuth prompt-cache routing #4159, compaction/history fencing #4133 through #4148, task lock ordering #4161) plus the Effect Wave 4 runtime refactors and deslop passes 1 through 3.

Implementation

Bumped with node ./scripts/set-package-version.js 0.28.5 so the root package.json and the legacy packages/mux-compat forwarding package stay version-locked. src/common/compat/productIdentity.test.ts passes locally (8/8).

After this PR merges, the v0.28.5 tag will be applied to the squash commit and the GitHub Release published to trigger the desktop/npm/docker pipelines.


Generated with xum • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5-1 • Thinking: xhigh • Cost: $1.64

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-09T10:16:31.978671Z b03f96b Manual request
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-09-09T10:20:04.582594Z b03f96b Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@ibetitsmike

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: b03f96b4b1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b03f96b4b1

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ibetitsmike
ibetitsmike added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 9, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 16bcc01 Sep 9, 2026
35 of 38 checks passed
@ibetitsmike
ibetitsmike deleted the mike/release-v0.28.5 branch September 9, 2026 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant