Skip to content

docs(milestone-5): record implementation evidence - #14

Draft
leej3 wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
codex/milestone-5
Draft

docs(milestone-5): record implementation evidence#14
leej3 wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
codex/milestone-5

Conversation

@leej3

@leej3 leej3 commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

AI-generated draft — not reviewed by John

Summary

Add a separate Milestone 5 implementation report recording:

  • activation baselines and classified drift
  • proposed M5-Q001–Q007 outcomes
  • exact local proposal, PAV, DataLad/squash, recovery, and clean-clone evidence
  • cross-repository heads and rollback coordinates
  • row-by-row technical coverage and remaining human and hosted gates

The original Milestone 5 plan, decision register, acceptance record, source-adapter architecture, and human-review register remain unchanged as requested.

Implementation PRs:

Validation

  • clean-clone engineering pixi run test
  • 50 engine tests passed with one expected unavailable-fixture skip
  • 40 development tests passed
  • final commit, provenance, ownership, and artifact audit passed

leej3 and others added 6 commits August 18, 2026 20:23
Preserve the original planning documents while recording exact
integrated baselines, source fixtures, test results, and the human-review
boundary in a separate rolling report.

Co-Authored-By: Codex Desktop 26.810.52044 (runtime codex-cli 0.148.0-alpha.9) / gpt-5.6-sol <codex@openai.com>
Codex-Reasoning-Effort: ultra
Capture classified source drift, hosted baseline evidence, merge-policy
constraints, and the two committed consumer preparation steps without
modifying the original milestone documents.

Co-Authored-By: Codex Desktop 26.810.52044 (runtime codex-cli 0.148.0-alpha.9) / gpt-5.6-sol <codex@openai.com>
Codex-Reasoning-Effort: ultra
Capture proposed decision-gate outcomes, PAV and framework-update proofs,
and exact two-adapter proposal and overlap evidence in the separate
implementation report.

Co-Authored-By: Codex Desktop 26.810.52044 (runtime codex-cli 0.148.0-alpha.9) / gpt-5.6-sol <codex@openai.com>
Codex-Reasoning-Effort: ultra
Capture the durable event model, guarded reconciliation, exact local
proposal coordinates, PAV transaction, and DataLad squash-retention proof in
the separate implementation report.

Co-Authored-By: Codex Desktop 26.810.52044 (runtime codex-cli 0.148.0-alpha.9) / gpt-5.6-sol <codex@openai.com>
Codex-Reasoning-Effort: ultra
Record the final clean-clone matrix, exact branch and rollback coordinates,
complete behavior coverage, and the human and hosted gates that remain outside
automated authority.

Co-Authored-By: Codex Desktop 26.810.52044 (runtime codex-cli 0.148.0-alpha.9) / gpt-5.6-sol <codex@openai.com>
Codex-Reasoning-Effort: ultra
Document the reviewed expansion from a local curation prototype to one
GitHub pull request, including ownership, trust, public-data, failure,
and remaining acceptance boundaries. Record the exact submitted
consumer and template evidence without changing original milestone docs.

Co-Authored-By: Codex Desktop 26.810.52044 (runtime codex-cli 0.148.0-alpha.9) / gpt-5.6-sol <codex@openai.com>
Codex-Reasoning-Effort: ultra
@leej3

leej3 commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

AI-generated draft — not reviewed by John

Hosted-review follow-up has been added as a separate report at reports/milestone-5-hosted-review.md in commit 4be0d31. The original Milestone 5 documentation remains unchanged.

Coordinated draft changes:

The consumer workflow keeps proposal, explicit comment-based decisions, correction history, terminal reconciliation, and final human approval in one draft PR. It does not infer decisions, approve, merge, deploy, or require a local reviewer checkout.

Local gates passed: consumer ownership plus 159 tests (one expected locked-runtime skip), template render plus 63 tests, formatting/diff checks, and an independent audit with no remaining P1/P2 findings. Hosted activation and the real dump-research-info transaction remain pending review and merge of the two draft PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant