Conversation
release-please's "python" release-type bumps pyproject.toml's version field but has no notion of uv.lock, so the lockfile's embedded secrules-parsing version (0.2.4) drifted from pyproject.toml (0.4.1), breaking the `uv sync --locked` step in the regression matrix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
c6e387e
into
coreruleset:release-please--branches--main
Summary
release-please's
pythonrelease-type bumpspyproject.toml'sversionfield but has no notion ofuv.lock. On #141 this leftuv.lock's embeddedsecrules-parsingversion at0.2.4whilepyproject.tomlmoved to0.4.1, which fails theuv sync --lockedstep in the regression matrix (failing job):This targets #141's branch directly and just runs
uv lock— one-line diff,uv sync --lockedanduv run pytestboth pass locally (149 passed, 11 xfailed).🤖 Generated with Claude Code