🛡️ Sentinel: Harden security headers and improve CSP consistency#57
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
- Add Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) with preload and subdomains. - Add Permissions-Policy to restrict sensitive browser features. - Update X-XSS-Protection to 0 (opting for CSP-based protection). - Fix CSP inconsistency between main app and docs. - Remove invalid frame-ancestors from docs meta-tag. - Maintain unsafe-eval to prevent regressions in Next.js/Nextra.
amrabed
force-pushed
the
sentinel-security-hardening-2536189552405342294
branch
from
a0f3192 to
0af8311
Compare
1 participant
🛡️ Sentinel: Security Hardening
🚨 Severity: MEDIUM (Enhancement)
💡 Vulnerability:
frame-ancestors) in meta tag.🎯 Impact:
🔧 Fix:
Strict-Transport-Security,Permissions-Policy, and updatedX-XSS-Protectioninnext.config.ts.next.config.tsanddocs/layout.tsx.frame-ancestorsfrom meta tags as it's ignored by browsers in that context (kept in headers).✅ Verification:
pnpm buildandpnpm --filter docs build(Successful).pnpm test(All 23 unit tests passed).pnpm test:e2e(All 4 E2E tests passed).PR created automatically by Jules for task 2536189552405342294 started by @amrabed