Proposal: Switching from Astro ASO to Sonar for Cross-Platform Support and Better Cost-Efficiency

[jtaxiexpress]

Hi,This is great project! I used that.

I noticed that the project currently uses Astro ASO for localization and store optimization. I would like to propose migrating from Astro to Sonar (https://trysonar.app/).

Here are the key reasons why Sonar could be a better fit for this project:

1. Google Play Support
2. Cost-Efficiency:Sonar offers an API Credits Plan, which allows us to optimize and manage metadata at a much lower cost compared to Astro's pricing model.

You can see a detailed comparison here: https://trysonar.app/vs/astro

[fayharinn]

hey I don't have a subscription for sonar but feel free to add your own implementation and start a pull request, we can let users choose which aso tool they wish to use

[fayharinn]

Right now I'm doing a frontend refractor, please wait for it

[jtaxiexpress]

Thank you!

I confirmed that "AppCompete Keyword Review" has been added. However, it seems this is only for checking keywords. Also, doesn't it cost $3 per week?

I was wondering if we could set up effective keywords without relying on Astro. I think using sonner as an alternative to Astro would be a good approach for this. What do you think?

[fayharinn]

Hey,

For appcompete, it is free to track your own app keywords + 1 competitor with their mcp.

Feel free to pull request to add other tools! 🙏

Astro only works on localhost tho