Skip to content

[gem-team] v1.136.0 Enhance Workflow for Cached Token re-usages - #3853

Open
mubaidr wants to merge 2 commits into
github:mainfrom
mubaidr:main
Open

mubaidr wants to merge 2 commits into
github:mainfrom
mubaidr:main

Conversation

@mubaidr

@mubaidr mubaidr commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Checklist

  • I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
  • I have read and followed the Guidance for submissions involving paid services.
  • My contribution adds a new instruction, prompt, agent, skill, workflow, or canvas extension file in the correct directory.
  • The file follows the required naming convention.
  • The content is clearly structured and follows the example format.
  • I have tested my instructions, prompt, agent, skill, workflow, or canvas extension with GitHub Copilot.
  • I have run npm start and verified that README.md is up to date.
  • I am targeting the main branch for this pull request.

Description

  • Add plan cache context to avoid re-explroation
  • Structured execution to improve token cache usage
  • Improve tool call paralleize
  • Improve rule for simple communication
  • don't ignore bugs during run, either fix if trivial or log it for future work
  • enforce evidence to be optional

Type of Contribution

  • New instruction file.
  • New prompt file.
  • New agent file.
  • New plugin.
  • New skill file.
  • New agentic workflow.
  • New canvas extension.
  • Update to existing instruction, prompt, agent, plugin, skill, workflow, or canvas extension.
  • Other (please specify):

Additional Notes


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution abides by the Code of Conduct and will be licensed under the MIT License.

- Revised performance metrics in README.md for clarity and consistency.
- Enhanced feature descriptions in README.md to improve understanding of context management and cost efficiency.
- Bumped version number in plugin.json from 1.131.0 to 1.135.0 to reflect recent updates.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added agent PR touches agents plugin PR touches plugins labels Sep 25, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 15 changed file(s).

Severity Count
🔴 High 1
🟠 Medium 0
ℹ️ Info 0
Severity Rule File Line Match
🔴 remote-shell-execution plugins/gem-team/README.md 69 curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix | sh

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Vally Lint Results

⚠️ Warnings or advisories found

Scope Checked
Skills 0
Agents 12
Total 12
Severity Count
❌ Errors 0
⚠️ Warnings 0
ℹ️ Advisories 1

Summary

Level Finding
ℹ️ Vally currently lints SKILL.md content. Agent files were detected but skipped:
Full linter output
### Agent files detected (not linted by vally)
ℹ️ Vally currently lints SKILL.md content. Agent files were detected but skipped:
agents/gem-browser-tester.agent.md
agents/gem-code-simplifier.agent.md
agents/gem-debugger.agent.md
agents/gem-devops.agent.md
agents/gem-documentation-writer.agent.md
agents/gem-implementer.agent.md
agents/gem-mobile-tester.agent.md
agents/gem-orchestrator.agent.md
agents/gem-planner.agent.md
agents/gem-researcher.agent.md
agents/gem-reviewer.agent.md
agents/gem-skill-creator.agent.md

@mubaidr mubaidr changed the title [gem-team] v1.135.0 Enhance Workflow for Cached Token re-usages [gem-team] v1.136.0 Enhance Workflow for Cached Token re-usages Sep 28, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚦 Submission status: ⏳ Awaiting automation

Risk tier: merge-risk:medium — New or substantially changed resource without privileged execution
Required to merge: passing submission-gate checks plus 1 approval from reviewers with write access.

Why this tier
  • Changes 188 lines (low-risk limit is 40)

Automated checks

Check Status Details
Line endings ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Spelling ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Generated README consistency ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Plugin and extension validation ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Plugin structure ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Skill lint (vally) ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Risk scan ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Contributor reputation ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Duplicate resource scan ✅ Passed Passed · logs
PR quality signal ⏭️ Skipped Skipped by its workflow · logs
Canvas/plugin smoke test ⏳ Pending Waiting for the check to start
Contributor risk signal 🔧 Infrastructure failure The contributor check succeeded but its result artifact was missing, unreadable, or for another commit · logs

Action needed

  • 🔧 Contributor risk signal hit an automation problem that is not caused by your contribution. Comment /rerun-checks to retry; maintainers are notified if it keeps failing.

Review

  • Approvals: 0/1
  • Assigned reviewer: aaronpowell
  • Review target date: not set
  • Still needed: 1 more approval(s)
  • No staffed reviewer pool owns these files yet; any reviewer with write access counts as the domain reviewer.

Commands

Command Who What it does
/rerun-checks PR author, maintainers Re-runs failed or incomplete checks and re-evaluates this gate
/request-review PR author, maintainers Asks the review rotation to assign a reviewer (adds needs-reviewer)

Updated for bfe4446 · This comment is maintained automatically — see submission gate docs.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant