Invalidly updated governed views point to older "newer versions"

[tkuhn]

If a governed view is updated by somebody who is not authorized, then the new nanopublication states "Status: This nanopublication has a newer version ..." pointing to the latest valid version, which is however in this case older than the given one. At least the wording should be improved in this case.

[ashleycaselli]

@tkuhn how can somebody who is not authorized update a governed view? do you have a specific example?

[tkuhn]

You can, but it's not recognized. Example here: https://w3id.org/np/RA64eoORu9pZfSDbINDbGtDe_z6PD3R-50KSHhbWQQsJY

[ashleycaselli]

If it's not a valid one, does it even make sense to point to it in this case? Maybe we can improve the wording by saying that the valid one is the latest and that there are X newer (and not valid in that context) nanopubs derived from it?

[tkuhn]

The link above points to the correct valid version, but the wording "has a newer version" is wrong, because the latest valid version is actually older than the given nanopub. So, yes, I think this is probably just about improving the wording.