Users/ishagautam/add inbound request triage template

[ishagautamMSFT]

[Adriana Trujillo (adrianatruji)]

Review feedback

1. Classification buckets, consider collapsing to two.
Since Noise and Other both effectively capture "anything that isn't an actionable request," and both lead to the same outcome (input deemed not relevant for any action/triage), would it make sense to keep only two classification buckets? The distinction between Noise and Other doesn't seem to drive any differentiated downstream behavior.

2. request-handler agent node, truncated instruction.
The instruction "After successfully sending both emails, return ONLY this valid JSON:" has no content following it. Not sure if something was meant to be added here, but I believe a reference to the structured output fields is all that's needed to close it off.

[Adriana Trujillo (adrianatruji)]

Thanks for reviewing , ishagautamMSFT !
Quick note, I see request-handler still instruction still ends at "After successfully sending both emails, return ONLY this valid JSON:" with nothing after it. Could you remove this? Thanks!

[ishagautamMSFT]

Thanks for reviewing , ishagautamMSFT ! Quick note, I see request-handler still instruction still ends at "After successfully sending both emails, return ONLY this valid JSON:" with nothing after it. Could you remove this? Thanks!

Adriana Trujillo (@adrianatruji) Can you please double check since i didn't find any mention in the latest workflow itself

[Adriana Trujillo (adrianatruji)]

Thanks for reviewing , ishagautamMSFT ! Quick note, I see request-handler still instruction still ends at "After successfully sending both emails, return ONLY this valid JSON:" with nothing after it. Could you remove this? Thanks!

Adriana Trujillo (Adriana Trujillo (@adrianatruji)) Can you please double check since i didn't find any mention in the latest workflow itself

Mixed it with an older version, apologies!

This is good to merge :) adilei