Skip to content

cachetools upgrade - #283

Merged
Gustavo Hidalgo (ghidalgo3) merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
liamlego/update-cache-tools
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

cachetools upgrade#283
Gustavo Hidalgo (ghidalgo3) merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
liamlego/update-cache-tools

Conversation

@liamlego

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

cachetools upgrade

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

Checklist:

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • I have performed a self-review
  • Changelog has been updated
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Unit tests pass locally (./scripts/test)
  • Code is linted and styled (./scripts/format)

Comment thread pccommon/pyproject.toml Outdated
"azure-storage-blob>=12.20.0",
"cachetools~=5.3",
"cachetools~=5.3; python_version < '3.9'",
"cachetools>=6,<7; python_version >= '3.9'",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No upper bounds please.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@ghidalgo3
Gustavo Hidalgo (ghidalgo3) merged commit 3644b7b into main Aug 24, 2026
4 checks passed
@ghidalgo3
Gustavo Hidalgo (ghidalgo3) deleted the liamlego/update-cache-tools branch August 24, 2026 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants