Skip to content

build: use build-ci for benchmark merge-commit rebuild - #65362

Open
anonrig wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/benchmark-ci-merge-build-1677
Open

build: use build-ci for benchmark merge-commit rebuild#65362
anonrig wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/benchmark-ci-merge-build-1677

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonrig anonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The benchmark workflow’s merge-commit rebuild used make -j4, which skips configure. After node.gyp or generated sources change, that can leave the comparison binary unlinked against new files.

This switches that step to make build-ci -j4 V=1, matching the base-build job.

Standalone CI fix; not part of #65273.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/actions

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Aug 18, 2026
The merge-commit job used `make -j4`, which skips configure. After
node.gyp or generated sources change, that can leave the comparison
binary unlinked against new files. `make build-ci` re-runs configure
first, matching the base-build step.

Assisted-by: Grok
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursor Bot force-pushed the cursor/benchmark-ci-merge-build-1677 branch from ee2aff2 to 1968cd3 Compare August 18, 2026 01:38
@anonrig anonrig added fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. review wanted PRs that need reviews. labels Aug 18, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. review wanted PRs that need reviews.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants