Skip to content

8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils - #4624

Closed
wkia wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:masterfrom
wkia:bpc6ab63
Closed

8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils#4624
wkia wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:masterfrom
wkia:bpc6ab63

Conversation

@wkia

@wkia wkia commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is the backport of "JDK-8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils" to jdk17u-dev. I'm backporting this as the tests have the same problem as in jdk25.

Clean backport. No risk, test changes only. Tier1 is OK. The build problems in SignatureUtil.java are not related to the change.



Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8359735 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4624/head:pull/4624
$ git checkout pull/4624

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4624
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4624/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4624

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4624

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4624.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper

bridgekeeper Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Welcome back rmarchenko! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wkia This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils

You can use pull request commands such as /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk Bot changed the title Backport c6ab63d306511c43622fc1f37e1aed6d8abaaa09 8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils Aug 18, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Aug 18, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ @wkia This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 18, 2026
@mlbridge

mlbridge Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Webrevs

@wkia

wkia commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/approval request Backport to jdk17u-dev. I'm backporting this as the tests have the same problem in jdk17. Clean backport. No risk, test changes only. Tier1 is OK.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wkia
8359735: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Aug 18, 2026
@wkia

wkia commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/integrate

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Going to push as commit a834e55.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 21, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot closed this Aug 21, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 21, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wkia Pushed as commit a834e55.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant