HYPERFLEET-1247 - feat: introduce NTF-000 error code for endpoint not found#251
Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoJun 25, 2026
Conversation
6 tasks
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🔗 Linked repositories identifiedCodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughAdds Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 10 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (10 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Comment |
Risk Score: 0 —
|
| Signal | Detail | Points |
|---|---|---|
| PR size | 46 lines | +0 |
| Sensitive paths | none | +0 |
| Test coverage | Tests cover changed packages | +0 |
Computed by hyperfleet-risk-scorer
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
pkg/api/error.go (1)
22-30: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winAlign 404 text fields with
CodeNotFoundEndpointsemantics (CWE-436).
Codenow indicates endpoint-not-found, butTitle/Detailstill describe resource-not-found. Keep these fields consistent so clients and operators don’t misclassify route misses.Suggested patch
- detail := fmt.Sprintf("The requested resource '%s' doesn't exist", r.URL.Path) + detail := fmt.Sprintf("The requested endpoint '%s' does not exist", r.URL.Path) ... - Title: "Resource Not Found", + Title: "Endpoint Not Found",🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@pkg/api/error.go` around lines 22 - 30, The 404 ProblemDetails in error handling are inconsistent with CodeNotFoundEndpoint semantics because the Title and Detail still describe a generic resource miss. Update the response construction in the error response path that builds openapi.ProblemDetails so the Title and Detail consistently describe an endpoint/route not found, matching the CodeNotFoundEndpoint value and the existing errors.ErrorTypeNotFound. Keep the same identifiers and structure, just align the text fields with the endpoint-not-found meaning.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@pkg/errors/errors.go`:
- Around line 43-44: The route-level 404 contract is using the wrong shared code
in docs and tests, while `CodeNotFoundEndpoint` should be the published value
for endpoint 404s and `CodeNotFoundGeneric` should remain for resource lookup
failures. Update every place that publishes or asserts the route-level 404
response to use `CodeNotFoundEndpoint` consistently, and leave
`CodeNotFoundGeneric` unchanged for generic/not-found resource cases; use the
`pkg/errors` constants as the source of truth when fixing downstream fixtures
and documentation.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@pkg/api/error.go`:
- Around line 22-30: The 404 ProblemDetails in error handling are inconsistent
with CodeNotFoundEndpoint semantics because the Title and Detail still describe
a generic resource miss. Update the response construction in the error response
path that builds openapi.ProblemDetails so the Title and Detail consistently
describe an endpoint/route not found, matching the CodeNotFoundEndpoint value
and the existing errors.ErrorTypeNotFound. Keep the same identifiers and
structure, just align the text fields with the endpoint-not-found meaning.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: c06c4e39-beaa-40d9-800b-c418a45f5bc3
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pkg/api/error.gopkg/errors/errors.go
🔗 Linked repositories identified
CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
openshift-hyperfleet/architecture(manual)openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-api(manual)openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-sentinel(manual)openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-adapter(manual)openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-broker(manual)
rafabene
force-pushed
the
HYPERFLEET-1247-introduce-ntf-000-error-code
branch
from
f5a4809 to
8e6c795
Compare
… found The catch-all 404 handler now returns HYPERFLEET-NTF-000 instead of NTF-001, allowing consumers to distinguish between a broken/misconfigured URL (no route matched) and a genuine resource not found (force-delete).
rafabene
force-pushed
the
HYPERFLEET-1247-introduce-ntf-000-error-code
branch
from
8e6c795 to
f296507
Compare
Contributor
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kuudori The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-merge-bot
Bot
merged commit 177f746
into
openshift-hyperfleet:main
9 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
CodeNotFoundEndpoint(HYPERFLEET-NTF-000) for the catch-all 404 handler (no route matched)SendNotFound()now returnsNTF-000instead ofNTF-001, allowing consumers to distinguish between a broken/misconfigured URL and a genuine resource not found (force-delete)NTF-001(CodeNotFoundGeneric) remains unchanged for service-layer resource-not-found responsesTest plan
make lint— 0 issuesmake test— 1265 tests passingFixes: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/HYPERFLEET-1247