You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The PP-26 batch-invariance witness (scripts/perf041_batched_parity_probe.sh, v3.1) is RED on gx10 (GB10, sm_121, CUDA 13.3, driver 590.48.01) at the v0.66.0 commit 53dd489e4, and green on lambda (RTX 4090, sm_89) at the same probe version. cuda-nightly run 34445264201 (2026-09-10T06:37Z), artifact pp26-witness-blackwell-gb10:
band
m formed
result
intra-batch agree to
m=1 agree to
reason
c=1
1
PASS
128
128
—
c=4
4
PASS
128
6
—
c=8
0
UNMEASURABLE
—
—
no batch with m>1 formed in the band's window
c=16
16
FAIL
31
6
slots of one batch disagree at chunk 31 < declared_min=64: the batch is not invariant across its own slots
Same probe on lambda (evidence/perf041/lambda/witness.json, c554a7731): c=1/4/8/16 all PASS, intra-batch agreement 128/128 in every band.
Model qwen2.5-coder-1.5b-instruct-q4_k_m.gguf (sha256 cc324af0…), greedy, seed 0, n_predict 128, CUDA_BATCH_WINDOW_MS=200; binary sha256 a89cd992… built on the host.
Why this is a code-class finding, not env
c=4 with m=4 is invariant to 128 on the same host, same binary, same model: the batched path itself works on sm_121.
c=16 with m=16 loses slot invariance at token 31 — a batch-size-dependent divergence inside one batch (every slot receives the identical prompt). On sm_89 m=16 stays invariant. The candidates are the m≥8/16 tile or reduction path (a kernel-family threshold that lambda's sm_89 does not cross, or the sm_121 build of the same kernel), not the scheduler.
The m=1-vs-batched divergence at token 6 is the known kernel-family divergence (recorded, not gated — PP-26 v3.1).
Ask
Reproduce on gx10 with the probe pinned to c=16 and vary m ∈ {8, 12, 16} to find the smallest m that breaks slot invariance; then bisect the kernel family (APR_DECODE_GEMM, CUBLAS_GEMM_THRESHOLD, FUSED_GATE_UP env knobs are recorded null in the witness).
Until fixed, PP-26 on gx10 stays RED in cuda-nightly; the 0.67.0 row 67-F1 ("PP-26 witness green on gx10") cannot close by observation. Recommendation: 67-F1 slips to 0.68.0 with this ticket as its blocker (the F rows are the schedule's "slip first" class); the release-host witness for 0.67.0 is taken on lambda as for 0.66.0.
Also in that job
The byte-compare step (PP-26 - witness byte-compare against the previous run (BSE-11)) fails with "gh run list failed (auth/API error)" — gx10 has no gh (#3083). That is a separate tooling fix (REST with the job token), PR follows; it does not change the witness verdict above.
Evidence: run 34445264201, artifact 10139689077 (witness.json, marker.json status DEFECT, probe.log).
Summary
The PP-26 batch-invariance witness (
scripts/perf041_batched_parity_probe.sh, v3.1) is RED on gx10 (GB10, sm_121, CUDA 13.3, driver 590.48.01) at the v0.66.0 commit53dd489e4, and green on lambda (RTX 4090, sm_89) at the same probe version. cuda-nightly run34445264201(2026-09-10T06:37Z), artifactpp26-witness-blackwell-gb10:Same probe on lambda (
evidence/perf041/lambda/witness.json,c554a7731): c=1/4/8/16 all PASS, intra-batch agreement 128/128 in every band.Model
qwen2.5-coder-1.5b-instruct-q4_k_m.gguf(sha256cc324af0…), greedy, seed 0, n_predict 128,CUDA_BATCH_WINDOW_MS=200; binary sha256a89cd992…built on the host.Why this is a code-class finding, not env
Ask
APR_DECODE_GEMM,CUBLAS_GEMM_THRESHOLD,FUSED_GATE_UPenv knobs are recorded null in the witness).Also in that job
The byte-compare step (
PP-26 - witness byte-compare against the previous run (BSE-11)) fails with "gh run list failed (auth/API error)" — gx10 has nogh(#3083). That is a separate tooling fix (REST with the job token), PR follows; it does not change the witness verdict above.Evidence: run 34445264201, artifact 10139689077 (
witness.json,marker.jsonstatus DEFECT,probe.log).