docs(drift): draft from internal source - #412
Conversation
Requested by @matirelay via /publish-docs-pr
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
|
Claude encountered an error after 3m 18s —— View job Code review — PR #412
The diff is a single-row deletion ( 1. The edited file is orphaned — this change has no user-visible effect
{ "source": "/references/protocol/depository/addresses",
"destination": "/references/protocol/addresses" }Since #379 (
So
Suggestion: rather than hand-maintaining the snapshot, delete the orphaned 2. Stale inbound links to the redirected path
3. If the page is kept, re-run the generator instead of hand-editing one rowLine 7 records the provenance: Removing a single row by hand leaves the table as an Aug-13 snapshot plus one later delta — so any chains added upstream since then are silently missing, and the table no longer corresponds to any single API response. If the page stays, re-run the full command. I could not reach 4. Question: does dropping a chain deserve a record?If 5. Adjacent, pre-existing (not from this PR)
What's fine
Bottom line: the one-line deletion is correct in spirit but lands on dead content. I'd redirect the effort into #1 and #2 — delete the orphans and repoint the two inbound links — which fixes the drift permanently instead of once. |
|
Claude encountered an error after 2m 46s —— View job Code review — PR #412
The diff itself is clean: one row ( 🔴 This edit lands on an orphaned page
And the canonical page doesn't hand-maintain this list at all — The list below is fetched live from the [Chains API](https://api.relay.link/chains) and stays in sync as new chains are added.
<Depositories id="mainnetDepositories" env="mainnets" />So if 🟡 The static table is stale beyond this one rowTwo independent signals that hand-maintaining this copy isn't working:
Suggested fix: delete If the table is being kept deliberately (e.g. as a static fallback for when the Chains API is unreachable), regenerate it wholesale with the documented command instead of removing rows one at a time — other rows have almost certainly drifted too. ⚪ Couldn't verify the factual claimThis environment has no network egress, so I couldn't hit Notes
No changes were made to the branch — this is review feedback only. |
|
Drafted from an internal source repo, requested by @matirelay.
This PR was auto-generated by the
reusable-docs-draft-prworkflow from a Claude-drafted update in the source repo. It is opened as a draft — please review, edit as needed, and mark ready for review before merging.Review checklist
CLAUDE.mdstyle rulesNeeds human inputitems from the source comment are addressedGenerated by
reusable-docs-draft-pr.ymlinrelayprotocol/agents-config.