-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
fix(items_after_statements): handle cfg_select! arms #17508
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
saberoueslati
wants to merge
3
commits into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
saberoueslati:fix/items-after-statements-cfg-select
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spans and source text is frail, it gets shifted, proc-macro'ed, replaced by
include_str!, and all manners of other modifications. Is there any chance that we could be made stronger?What about, instead of operating with spans, we query to
tcxone of its parent functions? Liketcx.hir_parent_iterThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked into this.
cfg_select!splices the selected arm's tokens into the enclosing block during expansion, keeping the original spans and root syntax context, so by the time we reach HIR, the resulting items are indistinguishable direct children of that block.I instrumented the lint to compare an item inside a
cfg_select!arm with a regular item after a statement:cfg_select item ctxt == block ctxt: true from_expansion: false outer_expn: Root
genuine item ctxt == block ctxt: true from_expansion: false outer_expn: Root
Their
hir_parent_iterchains are identical too. I couldn't find atcxquery that separates them; if there's one I've missed, I'm happy to switch to it.Given that, source nesting seems to be the only available signal. I've made that path fail open:
The first change also restores the grouped-
usediagnostics that lintcheck flagged as removed.Known tradeoff: this still misses an item after a statement within the same
cfg_select!arm. I'd rather take that false negative than the false positive.