Repository navigation
regression: temporary value dropped while borrowed #113237
Description
Activity
- addedT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.regression-from-stable-to-betaPerformance or correctness regression from stable to beta.Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta.
on Jul 1, 2023 - addedI-prioritizeIssue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}Issue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}
on Jul 1, 2023 edit: whoops there was an FCP for this in #104844 (which is the regressing PR)
searched nightlies: from nightly-2023-04-17 to nightly-2023-06-06
regressed nightly: nightly-2023-04-23
searched commit range: fec9adc...b628260
regressed commit: 21fab43edit: whoops there was an FCP for this in #104844 (which is the regressing PR)
This particular failure wasn't mentioned in that PR, however. Perhaps it was missed.
cc @cjgillot, crater on the PR found no regressions but we got one here. @djkoloski this is your crate^^
I've fixed the offending tests in tree. It looks like this regression only affected the specific test code, not any functional part of the crate.
WG-prioritization removing priority (Zulip discussion).
tbh I'm unsure on the best course of action here: maybe close the issue rather than leave in a undefined state? IIUC I see no clear actionable for us.
@rustbot label -I-prioritize
- removedI-prioritizeIssue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}Issue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}
on Aug 1, 2023 - addedregression-from-stable-to-stablePerformance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.and removedregression-from-stable-to-betaPerformance or correctness regression from stable to beta.Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta.
on Aug 18, 2023 - addedI-prioritizeIssue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}Issue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}
on Aug 18, 2023 I think the previous evaluation still stands (again: unless I'm missing some context). @Mark-Simulacrum does it make sense to remove the prioritization? And/or closing the issue?
- removedI-prioritizeIssue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}Issue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}
on Sep 4, 2023 maybe close the issue rather than leave in a undefined state? IIUC I see no clear actionable for us.
No objections for over a year. Let's close.
https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/beta-1.71-4/beta-2023-06-25/reg/munge-0.3.0/log.txt