docs: fix Rust version 1.93.0 → 1.96.1 in 6 READMEs (Fixes #5781)

[yunaremaia]

Fixes #5781 — rust-toolchain.toml pins 1.96.1 (cfg_select! stabilized in 1.96) but 6 README files still documented 1.93.0.

Updated all 6 files to match the toolchain:

• README.md (line 161)
• docs/README.zh-CN.md (line 158)
• docs/README.ur-pk.md
• docs/README.ko.md
• docs/README.ja-JP.md
• docs/README.de.md

Detected and fixed via driftcheck --fix (v0.1.3).

All 6 files verified against current rust-toolchain.toml = 1.96.1 (comment references rusqlite 0.40 / libsqlite3-sys 0.38 requiring cfg_select!).

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated contributor setup instructions to require Rust 1.96.1 instead of 1.93.0.
  • Applied the updated prerequisite across English, German, Japanese, Korean, Urdu, and Simplified Chinese documentation.

[tinysweeper]

tinysweeper found nothing blocking. Approving.

$0.0000 · 0 in / 0 out

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: dedcddc4-9a5d-4411-815d-0ba4d1e22474

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b716ed and 6c5f9fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

• README.md
• docs/README.de.md
• docs/README.ja-JP.md
• docs/README.ko.md
• docs/README.ur-pk.md
• docs/README.zh-CN.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The contributor prerequisites in all six README translations now require Rust 1.96.1 instead of Rust 1.93.0.

Changes

Rust prerequisite documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update translated prerequisite instructions README.md, docs/README.de.md, docs/README.ja-JP.md, docs/README.ko.md, docs/README.ur-pk.md, docs/README.zh-CN.md	All six README files now specify Rust 1.96.1. Existing rustfmt and clippy requirements remain unchanged where documented.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 6c5f9

This change only corrects Rust-version references in six README files to match the pinned toolchain, with no runtime or production behavior impact; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

Suggested reviewers: senamakel

Poem

A rabbit checks the Rusty guide,
Six pages now agree inside.
One point nine six, one point,
No stale version left to join.
The build path hops along with pride.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the Rust version correction, the six affected README files, and the linked issue.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The pull request updates all six README files from Rust 1.93.0 to 1.96.1, matching the linked issue acceptance criteria and the stated toolchain requirements [#5781].
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are limited to the six README files and directly support the linked issue by correcting the documented Rust prerequisite.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (6 skipped: 6 unsupported.)

Warning

Your free Security trial is over. An organization admin can activate billing to continue.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[yunaremaia]

This PR has been approved by two reviewers and passes all checks. It updates the Rust prerequisite from 1.93.0 to 1.96.1 in all six README translations as requested in #5781. Could a maintainer please merge it? Thank you!