SRE-1173: Depend on `^manifest` in `compile` and `compile:release` by claude[bot] · Pull Request #10007 · hashintel/hash

claude · 2026-10-12T17:16:07Z

🌟 Purpose

compile and compile:release build the hash-graph binary, which links every workspace crate it reaches. Neither task depended on the manifest chain of those crates, so its hash did not cover their sources.

This PR adds the ^manifest edge to both tasks. Both tasks stay cache: false until they declare their binary outputs, which SRE-1174 tracks. A cache hit without outputs restores no binary. That is what broke the merge queue on an earlier version of this PR, which enabled caching: hash-graph#compile got a remote cache hit, target/debug/hash-graph was never built, and hash-graph#start:test:migrate failed. #9987 is a related experiment with caching the debug binary.

🔍 Changes

The edits are in the root turbo.json. hash-graph is the only package that implements either task, and its turbo.json sets neither cache nor dependsOn for them.
The docs/task-dependencies.json files are regenerated with turbo run //#doc:task-dependencies.

The `hash-graph` binary links every workspace crate it reaches, so its compile tasks now depend on the `manifest` chain of those crates. Both tasks stay uncached. The task-dependency docs are regenerated.

The `^manifest` edges make the hash of both tasks cover every workspace crate the `hash-graph` binary links, so the tasks no longer need to opt out of caching. The task-dependency docs are regenerated.

codecov · 2026-10-12T17:25:51Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.98%. Comparing base (9d99b72) to head (b1785af).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10007      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.97%   67.98%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1945     1945              
  Lines      201707   201674      -33     
  Branches     8288     8286       -2     
==========================================
- Hits       137107   137105       -2     
+ Misses      62981    62950      -31     
  Partials     1619     1619

Flag	Coverage Δ
hash-graph	`21.28% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed · 2026-10-12T17:25:53Z

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.95%

⚠️

6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

as_constant

constant_equal

constant_not_equal

access

runtime_equal

runtime_not_equal

⚠️

1 benchmark spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

bit_matrix/dense/union_rows[1000]

⚠️

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	166.4 ns	137.2 ns	+21.26%
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	203.9 ns	174.7 ns	+16.69%

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing claude/sre-1173-manifest-edges-on-compile (b1785af) with main (a0c2313)¹}

No successful run was found on main (dd2d712) during the generation of this report, so a0c2313 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

cursor · 2026-10-12T17:58:27Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Turborepo task graph and generated docs only; changes when compile tasks invalidate/re-run, not application logic.

Overview
Adds dependsOn: ["^manifest"] to the root Turborepo compile and compile:release tasks so their hashes include inputs from every transitive workspace crate the hash-graph binary links, not just the app package.

Regenerates docs/task-dependencies.json across graph apps, workers, and integration/bench tests. Those files pick up broader affectedBy lists (e.g. full harpc-*, hash-graph-*, hashql-* chains on start / start:test / test:integration) and new affectedBy on hash-graph compile/start/migrate/healthcheck tasks—documentation of the graph after the manifest edge change, not new runtime behavior.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b1785af. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

vercel · 2026-10-12T18:10:58Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Oct 12, 2026 7:17pm UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Oct 12, 2026 7:17pm UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Oct 12, 2026 7:17pm UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Oct 12, 2026 7:17pm UTC

A cache hit for `compile` or `compile:release` restores no binary, because neither task declares its outputs. Both tasks stay uncached until they do, and keep their `^manifest` edges. The task-dependency docs are regenerated.

github-actions · 2026-10-12T19:52:15Z

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 531 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$25.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.503 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.779 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$74.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 612 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$428 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$88.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 913 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$80.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 764 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.50 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.528 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$60.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 655 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 913 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$67.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 699 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 764 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$84.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 724 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$92.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 731 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$77.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 701 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 543 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 884 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 907 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$526 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.65 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

claude Bot assigned indietyp Oct 12, 2026

SRE-1173: Depend on ^manifest in compile and compile:release

8d454a6

The `hash-graph` binary links every workspace crate it reaches, so its compile tasks now depend on the `manifest` chain of those crates. Both tasks stay uncached. The task-dependency docs are regenerated.

claude Bot had a problem deploying to pull-request October 12, 2026 17:17 Error

claude Bot force-pushed the claude/sre-1173-manifest-edges-on-compile branch from 4d43e06 to 8d454a6 Compare October 12, 2026 17:17

SRE-1173: Cache compile and compile:release

b980be6

The `^manifest` edges make the hash of both tasks cover every workspace crate the `hash-graph` binary links, so the tasks no longer need to opt out of caching. The task-dependency docs are regenerated.

claude Bot changed the title ~~SRE-1173: Depend on ^manifest in compile and compile:release~~ SRE-1173: Cache compile and compile:release behind ^manifest edges Oct 12, 2026

claude Bot deployed to pull-request October 12, 2026 17:21 Active

indietyp marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2026 17:58

indietyp requested a review from a team as a code owner October 12, 2026 17:58

TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Oct 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

indietyp previously approved these changes Oct 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

indietyp enabled auto-merge October 12, 2026 18:01

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut October 12, 2026 18:16

View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens October 12, 2026 18:16

View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash October 12, 2026 18:16

View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs October 12, 2026 18:17

View deployment

indietyp added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 12, 2026

github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 12, 2026

SRE-1173: Disable caching for compile tasks

b1785af

A cache hit for `compile` or `compile:release` restores no binary, because neither task declares its outputs. Both tasks stay uncached until they do, and keep their `^manifest` edges. The task-dependency docs are regenerated.

claude Bot dismissed stale reviews from indietyp and TimDiekmann via b1785af October 12, 2026 18:35

claude Bot changed the title ~~SRE-1173: Cache compile and compile:release behind ^manifest edges~~ SRE-1173: Depend on ^manifest in compile and compile:release Oct 12, 2026

claude Bot enabled auto-merge October 12, 2026 18:36

claude Bot deployed to pull-request October 12, 2026 18:36 Active

indietyp approved these changes Oct 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut October 12, 2026 19:15

View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens October 12, 2026 19:16

View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash October 12, 2026 19:16

View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs October 12, 2026 19:17

View deployment

claude Bot added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 12, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 7acbf0b Oct 12, 2026
236 checks passed

claude Bot deleted the claude/sre-1173-manifest-edges-on-compile branch October 12, 2026 19:46

lunelson mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2026

[Test] Cache the hash-graph debug binary in integration tests #9987

Closed

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

SRE-1173: Depend on `^manifest` in `compile` and `compile:release` - #10007

SRE-1173: Depend on `^manifest` in `compile` and `compile:release`#10007
claude[bot] merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/sre-1173-manifest-edges-on-compile

claude Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 12, 2026

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

This branch was successfully deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

claude Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 Purpose

🔍 Changes

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.95%

Performance Changes

Footnotes

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 12, 2026

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

This branch was successfully deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

claude Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading