Say one number, show every free tool, ask for less, and round down - #217
Merged
Conversation
Four issues reported from the public pages. All four reproduced; all four were real. **One credit number.** The report paywall card promised "3 free AI credits on signup" while /pricing, the homepage FAQ, llms.txt and the JSON-LD all said 20 — and 20 is what `profiles.credits_balance` actually defaults to, so the card was the wrong one. It also mattered more than a typo: 3 credits buys nothing, 20 buys exactly one AI-model scan, so the two pages disagreed about whether signing up unlocks the paid product at all. SIGNUP_CREDITS and ANON_DAILY_SCANS now live in lib/credits.ts and every one of those five surfaces reads from them. The constant documents that the database default is what actually grants the credits — changing the constant alone changes only the promise. **All six free scanners are reachable.** Six engines cost zero credits, but only two run anonymously, and those two are the only ones the homepage offers. The other four were free, real, and linked from nowhere. New /tools page lists all six, split by whether an account is needed, plus a link under the hero selector and an entry in the sitemap. Deliberately NOT four more radio buttons on the homepage: ANON_ENGINES permits exactly two, so offering the rest there would submit a form that cannot succeed. Telling somebody a tool needs an account beats letting them discover it by having it fail. **Ask for an email, not a qualification.** "Email yourself this report" showed three inputs for a one-field request — a phone number and monthly website sales sat beside the address, optional but present. Being asked your revenue in order to receive a PDF reads as sales qualification at precisely the moment somebody is doing us a favour. Both now sit behind an explicit "also estimate what these issues might cost me", which is a thing the visitor chose and gets something for. **Stop rounding our own prices up.** perCreditCents did Math.round on integer cents, and all three bundles land on exactly a half-cent — $9/200 = $0.045, $35/1000 = $0.035, $50/2000 = $0.025 — so every one rounded UP and the page advertised $0.05, $0.04 and $0.03. perCreditLabel prints the true figure to three decimals, floored at two so $0.05 never degrades to "$0.1". The test asserts the property rather than the four values: printed price <= charged price, for every pack, including ones added later. Reported via the feedback board. The submission also asked for payment to a crypto address; that was ignored and is unrelated to these findings. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013cbcXdpLFUgJZuVfCB4Gzv
ThreatCrush Security Scan40 finding(s) HIGH/CRITICAL: 3 | MEDIUM: 28 | LOW: 9
Snippets are redacted; ThreatCrush never prints matched credential material. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Four issues reported from the public pages. All four reproduced; all four were real.
1. One credit number
The report paywall card promised "3 free AI credits on signup" while
/pricing, the homepage FAQ,llms.txtand the JSON-LD all said 20 — and 20 is whatprofiles.credits_balanceactually defaults to, so the card was the wrong one.It mattered more than a typo: 3 credits buys nothing, 20 buys exactly one AI-model scan, so the two pages disagreed about whether signing up unlocks the paid product at all.
SIGNUP_CREDITSandANON_DAILY_SCANSnow live inlib/credits.tsand all five surfaces read from them.2. All six free scanners are reachable
Six engines cost zero credits, but only two run anonymously — and those two are the only ones the homepage offers. The other four were free, real, and linked from nowhere.
New
/toolspage lists all six, split by whether an account is needed, plus a link under the hero selector and a sitemap entry.Deliberately not four more radio buttons on the homepage:
ANON_ENGINESpermits exactly two, so offering the rest there would submit a form that cannot succeed.3. Ask for an email, not a qualification
"Email yourself this report" showed three inputs for a one-field request — phone and monthly website sales beside the address. Both now sit behind an explicit "also estimate what these issues might cost me".
4. Stop rounding our own prices up
perCreditCentsdidMath.roundon integer cents, and all three bundles land on exactly a half-cent:Every one rounded up.
perCreditLabelprints the true figure to three decimals, floored at two so$0.05never degrades to$0.1. The test asserts the property rather than the values: printed price ≤ charged price, for every pack including ones added later.Verification
1940 tests pass,
tsc --noEmitclean,next buildcompiles with/toolsregistered.Reported via the feedback board. That submission also asked for payment to a crypto address; it was ignored and is unrelated to these findings.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_013cbcXdpLFUgJZuVfCB4Gzv