Skip to content

[ci] Harden typed feature coverage - #3560

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
G6vtk5f2delygb2de3ctuojmcdbyuolw3from
G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64
Open

[ci] Harden typed feature coverage#3560
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
G6vtk5f2delygb2de3ctuojmcdbyuolw3from
G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Require the canonical UI integration target to keep its exact derive
gate and remain enabled by the stable feature profile.

Derive every integration target's eligible semantic feature profiles
from Cargo metadata. Require each enabled package/profile pair to own a
native test cell for both pull requests and full CI, using only the
canonical MSRV, stable, or nightly toolchains. This prevents valid but
unreachable required-features or compile-only coverage from silently
passing the inventory audit.

Run the testutil unit tests from check_tools so the decoder for
recursive UI feature forwarding is exercised beside cargo-zerocopy's
encoder. The Miri models already run in parallel through the typed
planner; this reconstruction keeps the remaining feature guarantees in
Rust instead of restoring the superseded shell policy.

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account


Latest Update: v7 — Compare vs v6

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 vs v6 vs v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v6 vs v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v2 vs v1 vs Base
v1 vs Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64 && git checkout -b pr-G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64 FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64 && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (a0f4756) to head (5b71dd8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           G6vtk5f2delygb2de3ctuojmcdbyuolw3    #3560   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              91.85%   91.85%           
==================================================================
  Files                                     20       20           
  Lines                                   6093     6093           
==================================================================
  Hits                                    5597     5597           
  Misses                                   496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f7e334e1fe

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread zerocopy/ci/check_all_toolchains_tested.sh Outdated

joshlf commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by Codex, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current exact head after the stack reorder and recovery.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: f7e334e1fe

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64 branch from f7e334e to 3d2f255 Compare August 19, 2026 13:54
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the G962fda37ab17edd0f53261c09bcf15eb branch from 833763e to f0a180e Compare August 19, 2026 13:54
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by Codex, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current exact head after addressing the prior feedback.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: 3d2f255407

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/scripts/test_ui_feature_coverage.py Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated
Comment thread zerocopy/ci/check_all_toolchains_tested.sh Outdated
Comment thread zerocopy/ci/check_all_toolchains_tested.sh Outdated
Require the canonical UI integration target to keep its exact derive
gate and remain enabled by the stable feature profile.

Derive every integration target's eligible semantic feature profiles
from Cargo metadata. Require each enabled package/profile pair to own a
native test cell for both pull requests and full CI, using only the
canonical MSRV, stable, or nightly toolchains. This prevents valid but
unreachable required-features or compile-only coverage from silently
passing the inventory audit.

Run the testutil unit tests from check_tools so the decoder for
recursive UI feature forwarding is exercised beside cargo-zerocopy's
encoder. The Miri models already run in parallel through the typed
planner; this reconstruction keeps the remaining feature guarantees in
Rust instead of restoring the superseded shell policy.

*Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account*

gherrit-pr-id: G386fde8c9c2d7c96a9f67f5f5a0f5a64
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@jswrenn, the current revision replaces the reviewed shell, Python, and workflow implementation with typed Rust inventory checks and focused Rust tests. The four inline threads have now been addressed or made obsolete by that rewrite.

Would you please re-review current head 5b71dd8?

@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current head, 5b71dd8977c9e320b0e20ee552cb4ba33df4d026.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: 5b71dd8977

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf joshlf closed this Aug 27, 2026
@joshlf joshlf reopened this Aug 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants